There have been several surveys asking Linux users which applications they want to see on Linux.
The Linux Foundation ran one in 2007, see https://www.linux-foundation.org/en/2007ClientSurvey
Results:
47.5% 4228 AdobePhotoshop
26.3% 2338 AutodeskAutocad
26.3% 2339 AdobeDreamweaver
21.7% 1935 AdobeIllustrator
- 20.8% 1849 MS Visio
- 20.0% 1780 MS Word
- 19.5% 1733 MS Excel
- 17.8% 1585 Apple iTunes
- 17.4% 1546 Skype
- 16.5% 1472 MS Outlook
- 15.8% 1404 MS Powerpoint
14.8% 1318 Intuit QuickBooks
14.6% 1297 AdobePremier
- 14.4% 1284 Intuit Quicken
13.6% 1209 MS VisualStudio
- 12.7% 1128 MS Project
11.9% 1061 Intuit TurboTax
- 11.1% 986 MS Access
10.3% 917 MS MediaPlayer
- 6.0% 534 MS Publisher
It is interesting to compare the popularity of web searches for 'linux' or 'ubuntu' with these product names using Google Trends. For instance: linux and itunes, photoshop, word, dreamweaver, excel and ubuntu and itunes, photoshop, word, dreamweaver, excel show that iTunes is searched for more, and thus might be more important for Linux users, than one might expect from the survey results.
Novell ran one in January 2006. Results as of 27 Feb 2006 (from http://www.novell.com/coolsolutions/trench/16957.html ):
AdobePhotoshop (1866 requests)
AutodeskAutocad (1315 requests)
AdobeDreamweaver (835 requests)
- iTunes (713 requests)
- Quicken (551 requests)
- Visio
- Quickbooks
LotusNotes (343 requests)
AdobeAcrobatPro (259 requests)
VisualStudio (210 requests)
- MSOffice (199 requests)
SteinbergCubase (196 requests)
WordPerfect (176 requests)
Two of these, Flash and Notes, have native Linux versions now. Those plus World Of Warcraft work pretty well under Wine, too.
The survey also counted which software vendors were requested the most:
- Adobe (4803)
- Autodesk (1416)
- Microsoft (1285)
- Intuit (1164)
- not specified (1011)
- Apple (791)
- Corel (475)
- IBM (397)
- Blizzard (278)
- Steinberg (186)
For many of those, there are free alternatives for Linux. Google for LinuxSignpost to find a good database about replacing windows applications. I could also imagine to integrate "alternatives" in our AppDB.
